Potiche (2010)

 I will borrow the single word of  David Denby in the New Yorker : Dreadful.

I am just dumbfounded  by the fact that such an inane film has had rave reviews from French critics as well as American and British ones. I usually try to understand the reasons for the appeal of certain films when I am critical of them. In this case I am clueless and will not even try to analyse the film, fearing terminal boredom.

“The metatextual element reveals the film’s intellectual complexity, though one could easily enjoy it as a simple comedy and miss that entirely”. (Jenny Kermode).  There was next to no laughs in the audience of the West End cinema where I saw it. Do simplistic mentions of the 70s feminism, unions, sexual liberation, mixed with modern political and cinematic references consist  intellectual complexity?  

There is no way I can consider Suzanne more than a cardboard figure and Ozon as having anything to say about older women.  And am I the only person to have been disturbed by the lack of nuanced expressions in Deneuve’s face ?

About rinaross

Born in 1935. MA in Film and Television Studies at the University of Westminster 1998. Studying the representation of older women in film since then.
This entry was posted in Ageing, Film Analysis. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s